↓ Skip to main content

The political economy of healthcare reform in China: negotiating public and private

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
The political economy of healthcare reform in China: negotiating public and private
Published in
SpringerPlus, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-2-448
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arthur Daemmrich

Abstract

China's healthcare system is experiencing significant growth from expanded government-backed insurance, greater public-sector spending on hospitals, and the introduction of private insurance and for-profit clinics. An incremental reform process has sought to develop market incentives for medical innovation and liberalize physician compensation and hospital finance while continuing to keep basic care affordable to a large population that pays for many components of care out-of-pocket. Additional changes presently under consideration by policymakers are likely to further restructure insurance and the delivery of care and will alter competitive dynamics in major healthcare industries, notably pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and diagnostic testing. This article describes the institutional history of China's healthcare system and identifies dilemmas emerging as the country negotiates divisions between public and private in healthcare. Building on this analysis, the article considers opportunities for public-private partnerships and greater systems integration to reconcile otherwise incommensurable approaches to rewarding innovation and improving access. The article concludes with observations on the public function of health insurance and its significance to further development of China's healthcare system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 125 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 27 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 37 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 6%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 29 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,581,648
of 25,649,244 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#350
of 1,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,379
of 211,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#19
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,649,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.