↓ Skip to main content

Comparative evaluation of rumen metagenome community using qPCR and MG-RAST

Overview of attention for article published in AMB Express, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Comparative evaluation of rumen metagenome community using qPCR and MG-RAST
Published in
AMB Express, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/2191-0855-3-55
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neelam M Nathani, Amrutlal K Patel, Prakash S Dhamannapatil, Ramesh K Kothari, Krishna M Singh, Chaitanya G Joshi

Abstract

Microbial profiling of metagenome communities have been studied extensively using MG-RAST and other related metagenome annotation databases. Although, database based taxonomic profiling provides snapshots of the metagenome architecture, their reliability needs to be validated through more accurate methods. Here, we performed qPCR based absolute quantitation of selected rumen microbes in the liquid and solid fraction of the rumen fluid of river buffalo adapted to varying proportion of concentrate to green or dry roughages and compared with the MG-RAST based annotation of the metagenomes sequences of 16S r-DNA amplicons and high throughput shotgun sequencing. Animals were adapted to roughage-to-concentrate ratio in the proportion of 50:50, 75:25 and 100:00, respectively for six weeks. At the end of each treatment, rumen fluid was collected at 3 h post feeding. qPCR revealed that the relative abundance of Prevotella bryantii was higher, followed by the two cellulolytic bacteria Fibrobacter succinogens and Ruminococcus flavefaciens that accounted up to 1.33% and 0.78% of the total rumen bacteria, respectively. While, Selenomonas ruminantium and archaea Methanomicrobiales were lower in microbial population in the rumen of buffalo. There was no statistically significant difference between the enumerations shown by qPCR and analysis of the shotgun sequencing data by MG-RAST except for Prevotella. These results indicate the variations in abundance of different microbial species in buffalo rumen under varied feeding regimes as well as in different fractions of rumen liquor, i.e. solid and the liquid. The results also present the reliability of shotgun sequencing to describe metagenome and analysis/annotation by MG-RAST.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
India 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Slovakia 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 63 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 31%
Student > Master 20 27%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 4 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 12%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 6 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2014.
All research outputs
#18,347,414
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from AMB Express
#796
of 1,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,703
of 198,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMB Express
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,229 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.