↓ Skip to main content

Accessory renal arteries in a Caribbean population: a computed tomography based study

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Accessory renal arteries in a Caribbean population: a computed tomography based study
Published in
SpringerPlus, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-2-443
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter B Johnson, Shamir O Cawich, Sundeep D Shah, William Aiken, Roy G McGregor, Hilary Brown, Michael T Gardner

Abstract

The commonest variation to the classic anatomic description of renal arterial supply is the presence of accessory renal arteries. The incidence varies widely according to ethnicity. There is no data on the prevalence of these anomalies in persons of Caribbean ethnicity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Lecturer 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 58%
Unknown 10 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2013.
All research outputs
#15,279,577
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#932
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,520
of 197,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#47
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.