↓ Skip to main content

Gap junctions, dendrites and resonances: a recipe for tuning network dynamics

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Gap junctions, dendrites and resonances: a recipe for tuning network dynamics
Published in
The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/2190-8567-3-15
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Gap junctions, also referred to as electrical synapses, are expressed along the entire central nervous system and are important in mediating various brain rhythms in both normal and pathological states. These connections can form between the dendritic trees of individual cells. Many dendrites express membrane channels that confer on them a form of sub-threshold resonant dynamics. To obtain insight into the modulatory role of gap junctions in tuning networks of resonant dendritic trees, we generalise the "sum-over-trips" formalism for calculating the response function of a single branching dendrite to a gap junctionally coupled network. Each cell in the network is modelled by a soma connected to an arbitrary structure of dendrites with resonant membrane. The network is treated as a single extended tree structure with dendro-dendritic gap junction coupling. We present the generalised "sum-over-trips" rules for constructing the network response function in terms of a set of coefficients defined at special branching, somatic and gap-junctional nodes. Applying this framework to a two-cell network, we construct compact closed form solutions for the network response function in the Laplace (frequency) domain and study how a preferred frequency in each soma depends on the location and strength of the gap junction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 7%
Uruguay 1 2%
France 1 2%
Israel 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 35 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 19%
Engineering 6 14%
Neuroscience 6 14%
Physics and Astronomy 6 14%
Mathematics 4 10%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2013.
All research outputs
#13,695,328
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience
#24
of 80 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,068
of 196,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them