↓ Skip to main content

Improving the carbon footprint of water treatment with renewable energy: a Western Australian case study

Overview of attention for article published in Sustainable Energy Research, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Improving the carbon footprint of water treatment with renewable energy: a Western Australian case study
Published in
Sustainable Energy Research, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40807-016-0036-2
Authors

Wahidul K. Biswas, Pauline Yek

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 21%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 23 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 21 27%
Environmental Science 10 13%
Chemical Engineering 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 26 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Sustainable Energy Research
#8
of 27 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,735
of 342,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainable Energy Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one scored the same or higher as 19 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them