↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of Potentially Harmful Psychological Treatments for Children and Adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 133)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Evidence of Potentially Harmful Psychological Treatments for Children and Adolescents
Published in
Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10560-016-0480-2
Authors

Jean Mercer

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 50%
Other 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 80%
Social Sciences 2 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,443,203
of 9,176,636 outputs
Outputs from Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal
#32
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,003
of 253,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,176,636 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 59th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.