↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of Potentially Harmful Psychological Treatments for Children and Adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 118)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Evidence of Potentially Harmful Psychological Treatments for Children and Adolescents
Published in
Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10560-016-0480-2
Authors

Jean Mercer

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 67%
Social Sciences 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,133,693
of 8,336,644 outputs
Outputs from Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal
#28
of 118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,627
of 242,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,336,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 60th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.