The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Evidence for perinatal and child health care guidelines in crisis settings: can Cochrane help?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-170 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tari J Turner, Hayley Barnes, Jane Reid, Marie Garrubba |
| Abstract |
It is important that healthcare provided in crisis settings is based on the best available research evidence. We reviewed guidelines for child and perinatal health care in crisis situations to determine whether they were based on research evidence, whether Cochrane systematic reviews were available in the clinical areas addressed by these guidelines and whether summaries of these reviews were provided in Evidence Aid. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 19% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,861,352
of 26,378,648 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,741
of 18,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,298
of 107,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#57
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,378,648 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.