Title |
Proteomic differences in amyloid plaques in rapidly progressive and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, March 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00401-017-1691-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eleanor Drummond, Shruti Nayak, Arline Faustin, Geoffrey Pires, Richard A. Hickman, Manor Askenazi, Mark Cohen, Tracy Haldiman, Chae Kim, Xiaoxia Han, Yongzhao Shao, Jiri G. Safar, Beatrix Ueberheide, Thomas Wisniewski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 42% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 179 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 27% |
Researcher | 24 | 13% |
Student > Master | 15 | 8% |
Professor | 13 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
Other | 30 | 17% |
Unknown | 39 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 39 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 7% |
Chemistry | 9 | 5% |
Other | 21 | 12% |
Unknown | 41 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,280,255
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#551
of 2,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,058
of 328,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#21
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.