LoL "Our results show that the vast majority of citations to retracted articles are positive despite of the clear retraction notice on the publisher’s platform and regardless of the reason for retraction." https://t.co/hTf8T1PoIG
Looks like it's not just social sciences – pretty much across the board https://t.co/NTne8mMLNX #CareerismIsKillingUs
RT @StuartJRitchie: It's not even that their being retracted will definitely stop people citing them positively (see e.g. https://t.co/A8Mw…
RT @StuartJRitchie: It's not even that their being retracted will definitely stop people citing them positively (see e.g. https://t.co/A8Mw…
It's not even that their being retracted will definitely stop people citing them positively (see e.g. https://t.co/A8Mwg1s32O), but it's still the right thing to do. Fingers crossed that the journal editors fix this decades-old mistake as quickly as possib
A recent article in Scientometrics, for example, found that not only do retracted articles keep being cited, but they are often cited positively, despite clear notices of retraction (2/7) https://t.co/RReayNQG3f
always pains me when this is pointed out https://t.co/JpBurDrZed
RT @jasonHoyt: To prevent citing fraudulent research, this article proposes an idea that retracted articles should be hidden or make downlo…
RT @Conde_Maca: @isidroaguillo Bravo! She's also co-authored an enlightening study on post-retraction citation. https://t.co/2eRYtGv0FN #re…
RT @Conde_Maca: @isidroaguillo Bravo! She's also co-authored an enlightening study on post-retraction citation. https://t.co/2eRYtGv0FN #re…
Vast majority of post-retraction citations are positive regardless of reason for retraction https://t.co/2eRYtGv0FN #research @GilsonVolpato
@isidroaguillo Bravo! She's also co-authored an enlightening study on post-retraction citation. https://t.co/2eRYtGv0FN #research