| Title |
Obstacles encountered during transradial angiography from after Radial Artery puncture to the aortic arch
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
SpringerPlus, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2193-1801-2-365 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Satoru Iwasaki, Kazuhiro Yokoyama, Kinya Furuichi, Hiroshi Okada, Akira Ohkura, Koichi Ide, Katsutoshi Takayama, Toshiaki Taoka, Kimihiko Kichikawa |
| Abstract |
To elucidate the key points for safe performance of transradial angiography. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 40% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 20% |
| Engineering | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2013.
All research outputs
#15,276,424
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#932
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,214
of 197,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#48
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.