↓ Skip to main content

Ginkgo biloba extract EGb 761® in the treatment of dementia: a pharmacoeconomic analysis of the Austrian setting

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Medica Austriaca, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Ginkgo biloba extract EGb 761® in the treatment of dementia: a pharmacoeconomic analysis of the Austrian setting
Published in
Acta Medica Austriaca, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00508-012-0307-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Rainer, Hermann Mucke, Sandra Schlaefke

Abstract

We used efficacy data from three clinical trials to investigate the pharmacoeconomic implications of treating noninstitutionalized Austrian dementia patients with a drug based on EGb 761R, a standardized extract from Gingkgo biloba. In a separate analysis, we compared the pharmacoeconomic aspects of achieving treatment success with EGb 761R and cholinesterase inhibitors.

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 22%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Psychology 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 23 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,937,279
of 26,316,305 outputs
Outputs from Acta Medica Austriaca
#626
of 991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,799
of 294,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Medica Austriaca
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.