↓ Skip to main content

Cyclostationarity-Inducing Transmission Methods for Recognition among OFDM-Based Systems

Overview of attention for article published in EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Cyclostationarity-Inducing Transmission Methods for Recognition among OFDM-Based Systems
Published in
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, March 2008
DOI 10.1155/2008/586172
Authors

Koji Maeda, Anass Benjebbour, Takahiro Asai, Tatsuo Furuno, Tomoyuki Ohya

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 67%
Researcher 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
#296
of 549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,043
of 95,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 549 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.