| Title |
Cyclostationarity-Inducing Transmission Methods for Recognition among OFDM-Based Systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1155/2008/586172 |
| Authors |
Koji Maeda, Anass Benjebbour, Takahiro Asai, Tatsuo Furuno, Tomoyuki Ohya |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 67% |
| Researcher | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2013.
All research outputs
#16,291,311
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
#278
of 551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,943
of 161,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
#22
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 551 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.