| Title |
Differences in the glucose-lowering efficacy of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors between Asians and non-Asians: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetologia, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00125-012-2827-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Y. G. Kim, S. Hahn, T. J. Oh, S. H. Kwak, K. S. Park, Y. M. Cho |
| Abstract |
The aim of this work was to compare the glucose-lowering efficacy of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors between Asian and non-Asian patients with type 2 diabetes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 29% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 93% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 18% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 46% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,498,849
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#1,625
of 5,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,801
of 290,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#5
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.