@Anthony_Bonato Comparing correctly and incorrectly classified twins generally yielded similar heritability estimates. The debate is over. https://t.co/5uO3v6xkIP
Violations of the EEA can lead to UNDERESTIMATION of heritability. Consider differences in the womb, assortative mating, nonlinearity, etc. Comparing correctly and incorrectly classified twins generally yielded similar heritability estimates. Get over it!
@kbkarlson We were skeptical and used twins who didn't think they were identical to test the equal environments assumption. We were surprised to find out held. https://t.co/seAJPjGVNt
@MagnusPharao @MagneFlemmen Der er masser af analyser af equalizer environments assumption, der viser at den er troværdig i mange sammenhænge. Se fx her: https://t.co/SrhLHWkxnr
@jayjoseph22 I'm partial to https://t.co/NEzTlcZL4V
2/ The main way they tested the GA was to find people who mistakenly thought the Sun was the Earth, or that the Earth was the Sun. Even when these heavenly bodies were mistaken for each other, researchers were able to confirm the geocentric assumption. htt
@jayjoseph22 1. You say twins physical resemblance may cause their greater psychological similarity. You don't cite this relevant work, for one. https://t.co/LWevgypl6N
EEA-oletusta on myös testattu empiirisesti. Jos kaksosten identtisyys on todellisuudessa eri kuin mitä vanhemmat ja kaksoset itse ovat luulleet (yllättävän yleistä), voidaan tätä käyttää hyväksi oletuksen testaamiseksi. Enimmäkseen oletus on saanut tukea.
@SicsicMichael @laurent_bach Celle-ci est souvent citée et trouvent la même chose dans plusieurs échantillons différents. https://t.co/7oVE8ieUOJ
@jayjoseph22 @DorothyERoberts jay, i'd love to know what you think about conely et al.'s 2013 paper which argues for the validity of the equal environments assumption. in his own words, this research was initially motivated by an effort to "dismantle" the
@RogueWPA @jayjoseph22 @pardoguerra Yeah and analyses of misclassified twins suggest it largely holds (https://t.co/1w5Y57OpI8). My preferred twin model bugaboo is whether the additivity assumption is reasonable. But regardless, the world has moved on and
And if the bias doesn't exist at all because EEA holds in your particular line of inquiry, then no problem. https://t.co/SjmmCPfa9n But EEA isn't the only assumption it's necessary for twin studies to make. So why the focus on that one in particular? 3/x
@ent3c Interesting, because most sources I found seem to say it's narrow (h2) not broad (H2): "...narrow-sense (additive) genetic heritability (h²) is calculated as two times the difference between the intra-class correlations of identical and fraternal tw
@rasmansa It would seem as though the EEA is probably ~fine. Really clever designs capitalizing on misclassified twins (ie, raised believing they were Mz, but actually genotypically Dz, and vice versa) I think yield best evidence of this: https://t.co/1vUQ
@AnupamBJena Can look at misclassified twins to bound the bias: https://t.co/2TVieT3LYV . Bigger question is whether heritability is useful to know. Manski JEP made me doubt this. https://t.co/wFt4ni0G1k
@Evolving_Moloch This is a pretty old critique of twin studies & there isn't much evidence that it biases results, even from researchers who were skeptical of twin studies e.g. https://t.co/gePahZtPoj https://t.co/DJSDyG9ram https://t.co/a6wpsPisSO
RT @schwartz_j: @saraannhart @fsnole1 Don't forget about @daltonconley et al's Fulker Award winning article leveraging misclassified twins.…
@saraannhart @fsnole1 Don't forget about @daltonconley et al's Fulker Award winning article leveraging misclassified twins. https://t.co/An0b5w4Jjl
RT @schwartz_j: .@daltonconley has an excellent paper on point #1 above making use of misclassified twins (e.g., DZ mistaken for MZ) https:…
.@daltonconley has an excellent paper on point #1 above making use of misclassified twins (e.g., DZ mistaken for MZ) https://t.co/An0b5wmkHV
Mi favorito sigue siendo usar mellizos mal clasificados como gemelos: se parecen como mellizos y no como gemelos https://t.co/36Tz5a9aJW
@daphmarts that's the main one, others include https://t.co/6s5wSgtrfC https://t.co/tOa53S7k87
@lucienchardon1 @RealAaronGross @charlesmurray misclassified twins paper https://t.co/JYesNxZsDf
Heritability and the Equal Environments Assumption - Evidence from Multiple Samples of Misclassified Twins: https://t.co/HeCQEBasJo
RT @Rosalind_Arden_: @AndrewSabisky best ref for a comprehensive test of the Equal Environments Assumption is Conley et al 2103 https://t.c…
RT @Rosalind_Arden_: @AndrewSabisky best ref for a comprehensive test of the Equal Environments Assumption is Conley et al 2103 https://t.c…
RT @Rosalind_Arden_: @AndrewSabisky best ref for a comprehensive test of the Equal Environments Assumption is Conley et al 2103 https://t.c…
@AndrewSabisky best ref for a comprehensive test of the Equal Environments Assumption is Conley et al 2103 https://t.co/qBV8Vcm6kM
@AndrewSabisky that one and this are my usual references for complaints on the issue https://t.co/YjZgIn9pW5
heritability and misclassified twins: Equal Environments supported, abs: http://t.co/ka7IVEJK8e ..
heritability and misclassified twins: Equal Environments supported, abs: http://t.co/ka7IVEJK8e ..
おっ、出た。双生児の判断を誤った双生児で遺伝率の推定。等環境仮説は妥当だよ。 Heritability and the Equal Environments Assumption: Evidence from Multiple … http://t.co/oUHhSzLk81
おっ、出た。双生児の判断を誤った双生児で遺伝率の推定。等環境仮説は妥当だよ。 Heritability and the Equal Environments Assumption: Evidence from Multiple … http://t.co/oUHhSzLk81
おっ、出た。双生児の判断を誤った双生児で遺伝率の推定。等環境仮説は妥当だよ。 Heritability and the Equal Environments Assumption: Evidence from Multiple … http://t.co/oUHhSzLk81