The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Polyunsaturated fatty acids and T‐cell function: Implications for the neonate
|
---|---|
Published in |
Lipids, September 2001
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11745-001-0813-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Catherine J. Field, M. Thomas Clandinin, John E. Van Aerde |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
Researcher | 5 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 26% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 13% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 16% |
Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2017.
All research outputs
#5,701,475
of 26,187,546 outputs
Outputs from Lipids
#293
of 1,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,864
of 39,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lipids
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,187,546 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.