↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Child & Family Studies, January 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Journal of Child & Family Studies, January 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1022096103344
Authors

Laura A. Nabors, Mark D. Weist, Matthew W. Reynolds, Nancy A. Tashman, Chianti Y. Jackson

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Ireland 1 5%
Argentina 1 5%
Unknown 19 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 32%
Student > Master 4 18%
Other 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 73%
Unspecified 3 14%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2003.
All research outputs
#3,547,300
of 12,342,397 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Child & Family Studies
#253
of 782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,865
of 259,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Child & Family Studies
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,342,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.