↓ Skip to main content

A wireless sensor system for a biofeedback training of hammer throwers

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
A wireless sensor system for a biofeedback training of hammer throwers
Published in
SpringerPlus, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-3069-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ye Wang, Bingjun Wan, Hua Li, Gongbing Shan, Ye Wang, Bingjun Wan, Hua Li, Gongbing Shan

Abstract

Hammer-throw has a long-standing history in track and field, but unlike some other sports events, men's hammer throw has not seen a new world record since 1986. One of the possible reasons for this stagnation could be the lack of real-time biomechanical feedback training. In this study, we proposed to establish scientifically described training targets and routes, which in turn required tools that could measure and quantify characteristics of an effective hammer-throw. Towards this goal, we have developed a real-time biomechanical feedback device-a wireless sensor system-to help the training of hammer-throw. The system includes two sensors-an infrared proximity sensor for tracing the hip vertical movement and a load cell for recording the wire tension during a hammer-throw. The system uses XBees for data transmission and an Arduino processor for data processing and system control. The results revealed that the wire tension measurement could supply sufficient key features for coaches to analyze hammer-throw and give real-time feedback for improving training efficiency.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 30%
Student > Master 5 15%
Lecturer 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 18%
Sports and Recreations 6 18%
Computer Science 4 12%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2017.
All research outputs
#13,028,533
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#630
of 1,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,995
of 344,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#96
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.