↓ Skip to main content

Evidence accumulation in decision making: Unifying the “take the best” and the “rational” models

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
221 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Evidence accumulation in decision making: Unifying the “take the best” and the “rational” models
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, April 2004
DOI 10.3758/bf03196581
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael D. Lee, Tarrant D. R. Cummins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Germany 5 2%
Switzerland 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 212 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 27%
Researcher 49 20%
Student > Master 27 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Other 50 21%
Unknown 19 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 133 55%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 6%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Computer Science 9 4%
Engineering 9 4%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 30 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2022.
All research outputs
#5,621,379
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#1
of 6 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,486
of 65,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one scored the same or higher as 5 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them