↓ Skip to main content

Emergent Dynamical Properties of the BCM Learning Rule

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Emergent Dynamical Properties of the BCM Learning Rule
Published in
The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13408-017-0044-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lawrence C. Udeigwe, Paul W. Munro, G. Bard Ermentrout

Abstract

The Bienenstock-Cooper-Munro (BCM) learning rule provides a simple setup for synaptic modification that combines a Hebbian product rule with a homeostatic mechanism that keeps the weights bounded. The homeostatic part of the learning rule depends on the time average of the post-synaptic activity and provides a sliding threshold that distinguishes between increasing or decreasing weights. There are, thus, two essential time scales in the BCM rule: a homeostatic time scale, and a synaptic modification time scale. When the dynamics of the stimulus is rapid enough, it is possible to reduce the BCM rule to a simple averaged set of differential equations. In previous analyses of this model, the time scale of the sliding threshold is usually faster than that of the synaptic modification. In this paper, we study the dynamical properties of these averaged equations when the homeostatic time scale is close to the synaptic modification time scale. We show that instabilities arise leading to oscillations and in some cases chaos and other complex dynamics. We consider three cases: one neuron with two weights and two stimuli, one neuron with two weights and three stimuli, and finally a weakly interacting network of neurons.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 13 34%
Engineering 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 9 24%