↓ Skip to main content

Cohort profile: mental health following extreme trauma in a northern Ugandan cohort of W ar-A ffected Y outh S tudy (The WAYS Study)

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
Cohort profile: mental health following extreme trauma in a northern Ugandan cohort of W ar-A ffected Y outh S tudy (The WAYS Study)
Published in
SpringerPlus, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-2-300
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kennedy Amone-P’Olak, Peter B Jones, Rosemary Abbott, Richard Meiser-Stedman, Emilio Ovuga, Tim J Croudace

Abstract

War experiences are associated with the risk of long-term mental health problems. The War-affected Youths (WAYS) Study comprises a cohort of 539 youths (61% female) aged between 18 to 25 (at baseline) randomly sampled from the population of war-affected youths in northern Uganda. The study aims to chart the trajectory of long-term mental health consequences of war and the roles of individual, family, and community contextual risk and protective factors in influencing the course of mental health using Social Ecology Model, thus, addressing both the individual and its social ecology. Knowledge of postwar contexts may inform policy and guide interventions on postwar psychosocial adjustment and reintegration in conflict-prone Great Lakes region of Africa (Rwanda, Burundi, DR Congo, Uganda, Central African Republic, and South Sudan). Two waves of data collection have been conducted and more data collection is planned. At baseline, information on demographic characteristics, pre-war experiences, psychosocial outcomes, coping, stigma/discrimination, family and community acceptance and relationship, family functioning, and post-war experiences were obtained. At follow-up, information on general health, gender-based violence, PTSD, social skills, trauma memory quality, rumination, self-esteem, and psychosocial outcomes were collected. Approval to access the data can be obtained on application to the Principal Investigator upon submission of a research proposal with ethical approval from the applicant's institution. This research is funded by Wellcome Trust and Gulu University.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 149 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 19%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 36 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 26%
Social Sciences 26 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 42 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2013.
All research outputs
#3,970,133
of 24,673,288 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#221
of 1,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,997
of 199,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#8
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,673,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.