Title |
Fen meadows on the move for the conservation of Maculinea (Phengaris) teleius butterflies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Insect Conservation, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10841-016-9941-3 |
Authors |
I. Wynhoff, A. M. Kolvoort, C. F. Bassignana, M. P. Berg, F. Van Langevelde |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 13 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 25% |
Environmental Science | 7 | 19% |
Engineering | 3 | 8% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,537,163
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Conservation
#299
of 752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,180
of 424,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Conservation
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.