↓ Skip to main content

Radiological findings of unilateral tuberculous lung destruction

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Radiological findings of unilateral tuberculous lung destruction
Published in
Insights into Imaging, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13244-017-0547-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diego Varona Porres, Oscar Persiva, Esther Pallisa, Jordi Andreu

Abstract

The aim of this report is to identify the radiological findings of unilateral tuberculous lung destruction (UTLD). Thirteen patients with (UTLD) were reviewed from 1999 to 2014. Only patients with radiological evidence of absence of pulmonary parenchyma preserved were included. Clinical and demographic data were obtained and radiological studies (chest radiograph and CT) were retrospectively reviewed. The left lung was more commonly involved (85%). The following radiological findings were found in all cases: a decrease in the diameter of the pulmonary vessels of the affected lung, herniation of the contralateral lung and hypertrophy of the ribs and/or thickening of extrapleural fat. Two radiological patterns were identified: UTLD with cystic bronchiectasis (85%) and UTLD without residual cystic bronchiectasis (15%). Forty-six per cent of cases had respiratory infection symptoms with presence of air-fluid levels in the affected lung as the most common finding in these patients. Total unilateral post-tuberculous lung destruction is an irreversible complication with the following main radiological features: predominantly left-sided location, decreases in the diameter of the ipsilateral pulmonary vessels, herniation of the contralateral lung and hypertrophy of the ribs and/or thickening of extrapleural fat. • Unilateral tuberculous lung destruction is an irreversible complication of tuberculosis. • Left-side predominance and herniation of the contralateral lung are characteristic. • Decreased diameter of the ipsilateral pulmonary vessels occurred in all patients. • The pattern with residual cystic bronchiectasis is the most frequent. • Superimposed non-tuberculous infections may affect the destroyed lung.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 20 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 35%
Unspecified 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 21 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2017.
All research outputs
#19,015,393
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#797
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,708
of 435,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.