Title |
Laparoscopic lavage versus surgical resection for acute diverticulitis with generalised peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Techniques in Coloproctology, February 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10151-017-1585-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
R. Cirocchi, S. Di Saverio, D. G. Weber, R. Taboła, I. Abraha, J. Randolph, A. Arezzo, G. A. Binda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 12 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 11 | 16% |
Spain | 6 | 9% |
Italy | 4 | 6% |
Brazil | 2 | 3% |
Mexico | 2 | 3% |
Turkey | 1 | 1% |
Chile | 1 | 1% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 26 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 38% |
Members of the public | 24 | 35% |
Scientists | 13 | 19% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 125 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 16% |
Other | 14 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 9% |
Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
Other | 21 | 17% |
Unknown | 37 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 47% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Unknown | 45 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,037,043
of 25,930,295 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#34
of 1,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,512
of 452,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,930,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.