The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Reliability among Senior Managers of the Marlowe–Crowne Short-Form Social Desirability Scale
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business and Psychology, June 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10869-005-4524-4 |
| Authors |
Edmund R. Thompson, Florence T. T. Phua |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Peru | 3 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 117 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 12% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Professor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 23% |
| Unknown | 12 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 39 | 30% |
| Psychology | 39 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,926,100
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business and Psychology
#221
of 534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,004
of 58,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business and Psychology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.