| Title |
Poor quality of life and functioning in bipolar disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40345-017-0078-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Louisa G. Sylvia, Rebecca E. Montana, Thilo Deckersbach, Michael E. Thase, Maurcio Tohen, Noreen Reilly-Harrington, Melvin G. McInnis, James H. Kocsis, Charles Bowden, Joseph Calabrese, Keming Gao, Terence Ketter, Richard C. Shelton, Susan L. McElroy, Edward S. Friedman, Dustin J. Rabideau, Andrew A. Nierenberg |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 154 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 46 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 34 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 51 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,307,921
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
#30
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,366
of 323,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them