↓ Skip to main content

Spontaneous breathing trial with pressure support on positive end-expiratory pressure and extensive use of non-invasive ventilation versus T-piece in difficult-to-wean patients from mechanical…

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Spontaneous breathing trial with pressure support on positive end-expiratory pressure and extensive use of non-invasive ventilation versus T-piece in difficult-to-wean patients from mechanical ventilation: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, April 2024
DOI 10.1186/s13613-024-01290-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mehdi Mezidi, Hodane Yonis, Louis Chauvelot, Guillaume Deniel, François Dhelft, Maxime Gaillet, Ines Noirot, Laure Folliet, Paul Chabert, Guillaume David, William Danjou, Loredana Baboi, Clotilde Bettinger, Pauline Bernon, Mehdi Girard, Judith Provoost, Alwin Bazzani, Laurent Bitker, Jean-Christophe Richard

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 33%
Linguistics 1 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,926,658
of 25,884,216 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#683
of 1,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,277
of 231,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,884,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.