| Title |
Onion-like graphitic particles observed in wood charcoal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wood Science, February 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00779560 |
| Authors |
Toshimitsu Hata, Yuji Imamura, Emiko Kobayashi, Kenji Yamane, Kohtaro Kikuchi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 24% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 6 | 35% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2010.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wood Science
#57
of 216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,009
of 109,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wood Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them