Title |
Examining projection bias in experimental auctions: the role of hunger and immediate gratification
|
---|---|
Published in |
Agricultural and Food Economics, September 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40100-015-0040-7 |
Authors |
Teresa Briz, Andreas C. Drichoutis, Lisa House |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 25% |
Student > Master | 5 | 18% |
Researcher | 5 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 29% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 14% |
Psychology | 3 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,472,998
of 25,826,146 outputs
Outputs from Agricultural and Food Economics
#26
of 169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,398
of 277,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agricultural and Food Economics
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,826,146 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them