| Title |
Managing sepsis and septic shock in an endothelial glycocalyx-friendly way: from the viewpoint of surviving sepsis campaign guidelines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-024-01301-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Toshiaki Iba, Cheryl L. Maier, Julie Helms, Ricard Ferrer, Jecko Thachil, Jerrold H. Levy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 271 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 68 | 25% |
| Colombia | 12 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 8 | 3% |
| Peru | 6 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 6 | 2% |
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Chile | 4 | 1% |
| Argentina | 3 | 1% |
| Paraguay | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Unknown | 141 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 263 | 97% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 2% |
| Scientists | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 29% |
| Other | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 57% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 166. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#252,927
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#24
of 1,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,808
of 265,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.