↓ Skip to main content

Peak and integral seismic parameters of L’Aquila 2009 ground motions: observed versus code provision values

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Peak and integral seismic parameters of L’Aquila 2009 ground motions: observed versus code provision values
Published in
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10518-010-9227-1
Authors

A. Masi, L. Chiauzzi, F. Braga, M. Mucciarelli, M. Vona, R. Ditommaso

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 12 50%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 25%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
#80
of 328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,409
of 181,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 328 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them