↓ Skip to main content

Peak and integral seismic parameters of L’Aquila 2009 ground motions: observed versus code provision values

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Peak and integral seismic parameters of L’Aquila 2009 ground motions: observed versus code provision values
Published in
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10518-010-9227-1
Authors

A. Masi, L. Chiauzzi, F. Braga, M. Mucciarelli, M. Vona, R. Ditommaso

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 46%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 9 69%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2015.
All research outputs
#1,695,687
of 7,169,178 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
#11
of 96 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,750
of 101,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,169,178 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 63rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them