↓ Skip to main content

Poly (ethylene terephthalate) recycling for high value added textiles

Overview of attention for article published in Fashion and Textiles, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 177)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
216 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
460 Mendeley
Title
Poly (ethylene terephthalate) recycling for high value added textiles
Published in
Fashion and Textiles, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/s40691-014-0001-x
Authors

Sang Ho Park, Seong Hun Kim

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 460 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 457 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 75 16%
Student > Master 70 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 13%
Researcher 31 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 2%
Other 33 7%
Unknown 178 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 61 13%
Chemistry 57 12%
Chemical Engineering 51 11%
Materials Science 32 7%
Environmental Science 20 4%
Other 57 12%
Unknown 182 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,691,984
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Fashion and Textiles
#37
of 177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,626
of 243,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fashion and Textiles
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.