| Title |
Influence of fluid accumulation on major adverse kidney events in critically ill patients – an observational cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-024-01281-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Debora M. Hofer, Livio Ruzzante, Jan Waskowski, Anna S. Messmer, Carmen A. Pfortmueller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 67% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Linguistics | 2 | 67% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#14,811,655
of 25,913,612 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#831
of 1,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,012
of 285,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#18
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,913,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.