↓ Skip to main content

Microbial degradation of pentachlorophenol

Overview of attention for article published in Biodegradation, February 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 117)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Microbial degradation of pentachlorophenol
Published in
Biodegradation, February 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00056556
Authors

Kelly A. McAllister, Hung Lee, Jack T. Trevors

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 49 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Other 15 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 29%
Environmental Science 14 27%
Unspecified 8 15%
Chemistry 6 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 6%
Other 6 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2001.
All research outputs
#1,689,935
of 7,152,412 outputs
Outputs from Biodegradation
#9
of 117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,778
of 98,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodegradation
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,152,412 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 117 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them