| Title |
Pathways from school to work in the developing world
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
IZA Journal of Labor & Development , January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40175-016-0067-5 |
| Authors |
Marco Manacorda, Furio Camillo Rosati, Marco Ranzani, Giuseppe Dachille |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 22 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,498,424
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from IZA Journal of Labor & Development
#21
of 56 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,421
of 424,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IZA Journal of Labor & Development
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.