The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective

@ExerciseBiology @lakens See info from Kruschke and Liddell on that… https://t.co/aq0N6agD73 https://t.co/JdHOEtUxEw

Link to the open access article we will be discussing: https://t.co/dUbfIZrTvH.

@1st_sealord Miksei. Artikkelissa perustellaan muun muassa joustavammalla mallinnuksella. Viite 27 artikkelista. https://t.co/5exhIbHMO8

RT @grantabt: @AlexTsompanidis @kareem_carr According to Kruschke the frequentist CI has no distributional information. That is, the values…

@AlexTsompanidis @kareem_carr According to Kruschke the frequentist CI has no distributional information. That is, the values at the edges are equally as probable as the point estimate. https://t.co/PWesY8PWlZ

RT @bolkerb: @SolomonKurz @GKountourides 💯 from a recently submitted paper: see also Kruschke & Liddell 2018 https://t.co/RKWYV5Y3a3 . I ca…

@SolomonKurz @GKountourides 💯 from a recently submitted paper: see also Kruschke & Liddell 2018 https://t.co/RKWYV5Y3a3 . I care much more about top/bottom in this table (discrete vs continuous) than left/right (freq/Bayesian) https://t.co/q8ufut2iP9

RT @thecrobe: The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective.…

RT @thecrobe: The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective.…

The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective. https://t.co/sFx16BR07E

RT @SolomonKurz: If you wanted to present Bayesian (vs frequentist) analysis to 2nd year grad students in a brief 20-40 min talk, what pape…

A lot of papers focus on the difference of Bayesian vs. Frequentist inference. I somehow feel they are similar in the context of hypothesis testing framework. Both propose a hypothesized distribution, then use real data to test it. https://t.co/N2QUvRSfF

RT @SolomonKurz: If you wanted to present Bayesian (vs frequentist) analysis to 2nd year grad students in a brief 20-40 min talk, what pape…

RT @SolomonKurz: If you wanted to present Bayesian (vs frequentist) analysis to 2nd year grad students in a brief 20-40 min talk, what pape…

RT @SolomonKurz: If you wanted to present Bayesian (vs frequentist) analysis to 2nd year grad students in a brief 20-40 min talk, what pape…

RT @SolomonKurz: If you wanted to present Bayesian (vs frequentist) analysis to 2nd year grad students in a brief 20-40 min talk, what pape…

RT @SolomonKurz: If you wanted to present Bayesian (vs frequentist) analysis to 2nd year grad students in a brief 20-40 min talk, what pape…

RT @SolomonKurz: If you wanted to present Bayesian (vs frequentist) analysis to 2nd year grad students in a brief 20-40 min talk, what pape…

RT @SolomonKurz: If you wanted to present Bayesian (vs frequentist) analysis to 2nd year grad students in a brief 20-40 min talk, what pape…

RT @SolomonKurz: If you wanted to present Bayesian (vs frequentist) analysis to 2nd year grad students in a brief 20-40 min talk, what pape…

RT @SolomonKurz: If you wanted to present Bayesian (vs frequentist) analysis to 2nd year grad students in a brief 20-40 min talk, what pape…

RT @SolomonKurz: If you wanted to present Bayesian (vs frequentist) analysis to 2nd year grad students in a brief 20-40 min talk, what pape…

RT @SolomonKurz: If you wanted to present Bayesian (vs frequentist) analysis to 2nd year grad students in a brief 20-40 min talk, what pape…

RT @SolomonKurz: If you wanted to present Bayesian (vs frequentist) analysis to 2nd year grad students in a brief 20-40 min talk, what pape…

RT @SolomonKurz: If you wanted to present Bayesian (vs frequentist) analysis to 2nd year grad students in a brief 20-40 min talk, what pape…

RT @SolomonKurz: If you wanted to present Bayesian (vs frequentist) analysis to 2nd year grad students in a brief 20-40 min talk, what pape…

RT @SolomonKurz: If you wanted to present Bayesian (vs frequentist) analysis to 2nd year grad students in a brief 20-40 min talk, what pape…

RT @SolomonKurz: If you wanted to present Bayesian (vs frequentist) analysis to 2nd year grad students in a brief 20-40 min talk, what pape…

If you wanted to present Bayesian (vs frequentist) analysis to 2nd year grad students in a brief 20-40 min talk, what paper would you have them look through beforehand? I'm leaning towards Kruschke & Liddell (2014; https://t.co/M0VcekD6Vw) "The Bayes

@RicardoRey_95 @Cognomada Ah y credit to @gongcastro por mí despertar bayesiano con este paper: https://t.co/B68TxaWsqL

Mentalmente, estoy aquí: The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective. https://t.co/WjStiCLzIS (es decir, en el baño, llorando y dibujando areas de equivalencia práctica).

@Jake_Elder52 @bolkerb @bmwiernik @PhDemetri The version of the figure @tjmahr shared comes from this article: https://t.co/M0VcekkXHo. But sure, the chart grossly simplified what, in practice, is more of a gradient of emphasis.

@SolomonKurz @bolkerb @bmwiernik @PhDemetri just gonna reply with another one of these https://t.co/Y1z2nJykdS https://t.co/m38nx2paZB

@JonathanCorbin2 Maybe this: https://t.co/M0VcekkXHo

@realkevinsmith It's not a tutorial, but this great paper explains the basic concepts of Bayesian hypothesis testing: https://t.co/PxzgtiXL5D and this one has additional explanations in the context of hypothesis testing: https://t.co/J06pDNtkea

RT @andrewheiss: For those wading into Bayesian hypothesis testing (like me!), this is the absolute clearest explanation of the different a…

@maya_spaur @anavasac @annie_nigra @TRSanchezPhD @mariana_mlazo Given the paradoxical results for steatosis & fibrosis, it may be good to re-analyze the data using an alternative method to null hypothesis testing, e.g. Bayesian methods. https://t.co/5G

The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective | SpringerLink https://t.co/ruAkFg2gZ5

@tcarpenter216 seems like you're comparing the top left and bottom right. keep it simple w the bottom row. classical stats estimates most likely parameters (best fitting) and sampling uncertainty, and bayes estimates the most plausible parameters given dat

Share the practical perspective using both whatever helps by circumstance. Part of my mind lazily fits on freq world view. But deep down, people just share their thoughts with each other. Science is evidence-based opinion. Bayesian is just more honest 🤥

Take this quiz with me:

@alexpghayes @bayesianboy @mcmc_stan let's all just specify our character alignment in kruschke's grid, okay? https://t.co/vMkfcrQHEf https://t.co/JbfRQ1NcAu

RT @AV_SP: Good to see #null_results reported https://t.co/L9W6C9lPGy Sample size N = 99; used Bayes factors (BF) to quantify evidence✔️bu…

Good to see #null_results reported https://t.co/L9W6C9lPGy Sample size N = 99; used Bayes factors (BF) to quantify evidence✔️but NHBT may be tricky, e.g., it could suggest strong evidence in favour of 0 but the HDI may not contain the value 0! See https:/

@nbonneel @CovaFlorian @TroncheBiais @ordre_medecins C'est loin d'être une question nouvelle, débattue maintes fois dans la littérature. Par exemple: https://t.co/l8FEmw4006

https://t.co/4ppyWz9fqu

@Crst_C Vos decís algo como esto? https://t.co/jiaN5Xo5Ec o esto? https://t.co/mU1a0GmRsH

Congratulations to THC research fellow @elborgo9 and author team for their latest publication on inter-device reliability in measuring sleep in free-living environments for healthy adults.

RT @elborgo9: After using a fully Bayesian analysis https://t.co/Ewjf9nCE0I and receiving 2 stat reviews - both very positive - paper rejec…

RT @elborgo9: After using a fully Bayesian analysis https://t.co/Ewjf9nCE0I and receiving 2 stat reviews - both very positive - paper rejec…

Sad but not surprising. My first fully Bayes paper had all sorts of classic reviewer comments, such as "please describe the power analysis performed prior to doing the study" https://t.co/W8zMitDxTk Your paper will find a home.

After using a fully Bayesian analysis https://t.co/Ewjf9nCE0I and receiving 2 stat reviews - both very positive - paper rejected and phys reviewer suggests I read “Magnitude-based Inference is not Bayesian and is not a valid method of inference” https://t.

RT @elborgo9: Revisited this paper today. I forgot how comprehensive it is! The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, m…

Really interesting paper!!

RT @jonaslindeloev: Great paper on why Bayesian posteriors often is the most informative inferential result: https://t.co/qascLBGxZb https:…

RT @jonaslindeloev: Great paper on why Bayesian posteriors often is the most informative inferential result: https://t.co/qascLBGxZb https:…

RT @jonaslindeloev: Great paper on why Bayesian posteriors often is the most informative inferential result: https://t.co/qascLBGxZb https:…

RT @jonaslindeloev: Great paper on why Bayesian posteriors often is the most informative inferential result: https://t.co/qascLBGxZb https:…

RT @jonaslindeloev: Great paper on why Bayesian posteriors often is the most informative inferential result: https://t.co/qascLBGxZb https:…

RT @jonaslindeloev: Great paper on why Bayesian posteriors often is the most informative inferential result: https://t.co/qascLBGxZb https:…

I also think more needs to be said about Bayesian interpretations of linear modelling. “Statistical Rethinking” has a good account

RT @jonaslindeloev: Great paper on why Bayesian posteriors often is the most informative inferential result: https://t.co/qascLBGxZb https:…

RT @jonaslindeloev: Great paper on why Bayesian posteriors often is the most informative inferential result: https://t.co/qascLBGxZb https:…

RT @jonaslindeloev: Great paper on why Bayesian posteriors often is the most informative inferential result: https://t.co/qascLBGxZb https:…

RT @jonaslindeloev: Great paper on why Bayesian posteriors often is the most informative inferential result: https://t.co/qascLBGxZb https:…

So much this! I don’t care if it’s significant I want to know direction/size/uncertainty

Great paper on why Bayesian posteriors often is the most informative inferential result: https://t.co/qascLBGxZb https://t.co/EbFKk4PZfP

RT @elborgo9: Revisited this paper today. I forgot how comprehensive it is! The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, m…

RT @elborgo9: Revisited this paper today. I forgot how comprehensive it is! The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, m…

RT @elborgo9: Revisited this paper today. I forgot how comprehensive it is! The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, m…

RT @elborgo9: Revisited this paper today. I forgot how comprehensive it is! The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, m…

Revisited this paper today. I forgot how comprehensive it is! The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective | SpringerLink https://t.co/Ewjf9nCE0I

RT @conormacd: The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective.…

RT @conormacd: The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective.…

The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective. https://t.co/r1RIQyEfl5

Good comment. I am no expert, but I suppose Bayesians might disagree to: "The same problems are likely to arise under any proposed statistical alternative that involves dichotomization, whether frequentist, Bayesian or otherwise" https://t.co/SI4oN12LfR h

RT @robertmarc60: The replies show many are worried about a path forward. Here are some very good sources: https://t.co/7dZ2Hg6vnB https…

RT @robertmarc60: The replies show many are worried about a path forward. Here are some very good sources: https://t.co/7dZ2Hg6vnB https…

The replies show many are worried about a path forward. Here are some very good sources: https://t.co/7dZ2Hg6vnB https://t.co/EoXRT3hLsE Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan. Richard McElreath. https://t.co/oO1veCFTiK

RT @bbzandbelt: These are great. I really grasped it when reading these: Chapter 11 of Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysi…

These are great. I really grasped it when reading these: Chapter 11 of Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis, Second Edition: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan. Burlington, MA: Academic Press / Elsevier and this paper, also by Kruschke ht

RT @grantabt: Fab paper by Kruschke on Bayesian/frequentist stats, inc. one of the best explanations of p values I've read. Also interestin…

RT @grantabt: Fab paper by Kruschke on Bayesian/frequentist stats, inc. one of the best explanations of p values I've read. Also interestin…

RT @grantabt: Fab paper by Kruschke on Bayesian/frequentist stats, inc. one of the best explanations of p values I've read. Also interestin…

RT @grantabt: Fab paper by Kruschke on Bayesian/frequentist stats, inc. one of the best explanations of p values I've read. Also interestin…

RT @grantabt: Fab paper by Kruschke on Bayesian/frequentist stats, inc. one of the best explanations of p values I've read. Also interestin…

RT @grantabt: Fab paper by Kruschke on Bayesian/frequentist stats, inc. one of the best explanations of p values I've read. Also interestin…

RT @grantabt: Fab paper by Kruschke on Bayesian/frequentist stats, inc. one of the best explanations of p values I've read. Also interestin…

Fab paper by Kruschke on Bayesian/frequentist stats, inc. one of the best explanations of p values I've read. Also interesting that the confidence interval contains no distributional info. Values in the middle no more likely than those at the extreme. htt

RT @andrewheiss: For those wading into Bayesian hypothesis testing (like me!), this is the absolute clearest explanation of the different a…

RT @andrewheiss: For those wading into Bayesian hypothesis testing (like me!), this is the absolute clearest explanation of the different a…

RT @m_clem: This is the clearest explanation of this subtle subject I have ever seen. Thank you. https://t.co/iVnuMWaPOs

RT @andrewheiss: For those wading into Bayesian hypothesis testing (like me!), this is the absolute clearest explanation of the different a…

RT @andrewheiss: For those wading into Bayesian hypothesis testing (like me!), this is the absolute clearest explanation of the different a…

RT @andrewheiss: For those wading into Bayesian hypothesis testing (like me!), this is the absolute clearest explanation of the different a…

RT @andrewheiss: For those wading into Bayesian hypothesis testing (like me!), this is the absolute clearest explanation of the different a…

RT @andrewheiss: For those wading into Bayesian hypothesis testing (like me!), this is the absolute clearest explanation of the different a…

RT @andrewheiss: For those wading into Bayesian hypothesis testing (like me!), this is the absolute clearest explanation of the different a…

RT @andrewheiss: For those wading into Bayesian hypothesis testing (like me!), this is the absolute clearest explanation of the different a…

RT @andrewheiss: For those wading into Bayesian hypothesis testing (like me!), this is the absolute clearest explanation of the different a…