| Title |
Nondestructive evaluation of egg-to-adult development and feeding behavior of the bamboo powderpost beetle Dinoderus minutus using X-ray computed tomography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wood Science, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10086-017-1642-3 |
| Authors |
Hiroki Watanabe, Yoshiyuki Yanase, Yoshihisa Fujii |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 18% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
| Professor | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 3 | 27% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,856,191
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wood Science
#75
of 274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,382
of 329,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wood Science
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 274 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.