@grg_perry Probably not right for every class but Elizabeth Lloyd (assigned with Gould and Lewontin). I think it’s this one. https://t.co/LzRipjuAH5
RT @BiolTheory: 🙂Free reading link, if anyone needs it: https://t.co/wXfZ0PvT2T https://t.co/9hewcd4M5L
RT @OscardelaCroixS: La crítica al adaptacionismo desarrollada aquí por E. A. Lloyd me parece imprescindible. Lectura recomendada para cole…
La crítica al adaptacionismo desarrollada aquí por E. A. Lloyd me parece imprescindible. Lectura recomendada para colegas y psicólogos interesados en evolución.
RT @ArlinStoltzfus: Yes, #philsci well worth reading for its explicit focus on actual explanatory practices. She shows that adaptationists…
RT @ArlinStoltzfus: Yes, #philsci well worth reading for its explicit focus on actual explanatory practices. She shows that adaptationists…
RT @BloomingtonHps: Currently reading: Lisa Lloyd's (2015) "Adaptationism and the Logic of Research Questions: How to Think Clearly About E…
RT @BiolTheory: 🙂Free reading link, if anyone needs it: https://t.co/wXfZ0PvT2T https://t.co/9hewcd4M5L
RT @BiolTheory: 🙂Free reading link, if anyone needs it: https://t.co/wXfZ0PvT2T
RT @BloomingtonHps: Currently reading: Lisa Lloyd's (2015) "Adaptationism and the Logic of Research Questions: How to Think Clearly About E…
RT @ArlinStoltzfus: Yes, #philsci well worth reading for its explicit focus on actual explanatory practices. She shows that adaptationists…
RT @ArlinStoltzfus: Yes, #philsci well worth reading for its explicit focus on actual explanatory practices. She shows that adaptationists…
RT @BiolTheory: 🙂Free reading link, if anyone needs it: https://t.co/wXfZ0PvT2T
Yes, #philsci well worth reading for its explicit focus on actual explanatory practices. She shows that adaptationists often simply do not accept non-adaptive explanations as comparably valid, but rather as a form of "surrender." This is one of the key p
hear, hear!
RT @BiolTheory: 🙂Free reading link, if anyone needs it: https://t.co/wXfZ0PvT2T
RT @BloomingtonHps: Currently reading: Lisa Lloyd's (2015) "Adaptationism and the Logic of Research Questions: How to Think Clearly About E…
RT @BloomingtonHps: Currently reading: Lisa Lloyd's (2015) "Adaptationism and the Logic of Research Questions: How to Think Clearly About E…
RT @BiolTheory: 🙂Free reading link, if anyone needs it: https://t.co/wXfZ0PvT2T
🙂Free reading link, if anyone needs it: https://t.co/wXfZ0PvT2T
Great paper.
Currently reading: Lisa Lloyd's (2015) "Adaptationism and the Logic of Research Questions: How to Think Clearly About Evolutionary Causes" in @BiolTheory Link: https://t.co/YaxL5BZ1su https://t.co/qDKUYt5tpi
Sobre a abordagem por fatores evolutivos x adaptacionismo metodológico: https://t.co/co72yg9p1N
@danli_o You've been very lucky then! Is this the work you're referring to: https://t.co/oUwIhUCXTp
@RodrigoMenegat Acho que vai ser difícil indicarem um único paper. Esse aqui, sobre a lógica das questões de pesquisa, acho fascinante. Cada pergunta contém em si um viés. Daí o cuidado extremo e a escolha por perguntas + investigativas e - indutivas, diga
@PersistentSeekr This one? https://t.co/Ssu89pOsvh
@LTF_01 Coming back to this, have you read any of Lisa Lloyd’s work? Philosopher of biology, former student of Gould’s: https://t.co/IqyQy48KTt (disclosure, she was on my diss committee)
[Ed.: Lloyd (2015) can be found here: https://t.co/seeeuctO7q]