↓ Skip to main content

A bibliometric review of cryptocurrencies: how have they grown?

Overview of attention for article published in Financial Innovation, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
Title
A bibliometric review of cryptocurrencies: how have they grown?
Published in
Financial Innovation, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40854-021-00306-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francisco Javier García-Corral, José Antonio Cordero-García, Jaime de Pablo-Valenciano, Juan Uribe-Toril

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 202 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Lecturer 11 5%
Researcher 10 5%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Student > Master 8 4%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 115 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 29 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 24 12%
Computer Science 6 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 115 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,701,276
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Financial Innovation
#64
of 249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,630
of 518,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Financial Innovation
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 249 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.