↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Feature-List Cross-Correlation Algorithms with Common Cross-Correlation Algorithms

Overview of attention for article published in ADS, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of Feature-List Cross-Correlation Algorithms with Common Cross-Correlation Algorithms
Published in
ADS, December 2007
DOI 10.1155/2007/89150
Authors

Ralph Maschotta, Simon Boymann, Ulrich Hoppe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 67%
Researcher 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 33%
Social Sciences 1 33%
Engineering 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,628,139
of 25,608,265 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#7,408
of 26,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,813
of 167,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#127
of 378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,608,265 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.