↓ Skip to main content

Linear and non-linear vibration analysis of moderately thick isosceles triangular FGPs using a triangular finite p-element

Overview of attention for article published in Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Modern Processes, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Linear and non-linear vibration analysis of moderately thick isosceles triangular FGPs using a triangular finite p-element
Published in
Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Modern Processes, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40759-017-0018-0
Authors

SA. Belalia

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 60%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2017.
All research outputs
#20,400,885
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Modern Processes
#19
of 35 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#356,083
of 420,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Modern Processes
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one scored the same or higher as 16 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.