↓ Skip to main content

Hip-specific and generic patient-reported outcome measure scores after primary hip replacement are associated with early revision surgery: a national registry study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Hip-specific and generic patient-reported outcome measure scores after primary hip replacement are associated with early revision surgery: a national registry study
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, March 2024
DOI 10.1186/s41687-024-00713-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilana N. Ackerman, Kara Cashman, Michelle Lorimer, Emma Heath, Ian A. Harris

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 67%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#14,518,258
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#212
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,443
of 180,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.