↓ Skip to main content

Coil embolization of a giant pseudoaneurysm associated with a disrupted axillary artery: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in CVIR Endovascular, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Coil embolization of a giant pseudoaneurysm associated with a disrupted axillary artery: a case report
Published in
CVIR Endovascular, March 2024
DOI 10.1186/s42155-023-00408-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naoki Oka, Akira Kuriyama, Yukio Ishisaka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,766,780
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from CVIR Endovascular
#94
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,900
of 185,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CVIR Endovascular
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.