↓ Skip to main content

A guide for the selection of routing protocols in WBAN for healthcare applications

Overview of attention for article published in Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
A guide for the selection of routing protocols in WBAN for healthcare applications
Published in
Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13673-017-0105-6
Authors

V. Bhanumathi, C. P. Sangeetha

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Lecturer 10 11%
Professor 8 8%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 29 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 37 39%
Engineering 22 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 33 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,629,130
of 25,848,323 outputs
Outputs from Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences
#19
of 85 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,332
of 328,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,323 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them