↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of FDG-PET for determining target volume during intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer involving the oral level

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Hybrid Imaging, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
Title
Efficacy and safety of FDG-PET for determining target volume during intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer involving the oral level
Published in
European Journal of Hybrid Imaging, March 2024
DOI 10.1186/s41824-024-00197-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasuo Kosugi, Keisuke Sasai, Naoya Murakami, Tatsuki Karino, Yoichi Muramoto, Terufumi Kawamoto, Masaki Oshima, Noriyuki Okonogi, Jun Takatsu, Kotaro Iijima, Shuhei Karube, Akira Isobe, Naoya Hara, Mitsuhisa Fujimaki, Shinichi Ohba, Fumihiko Matsumoto, Koji Murakami, Naoto Shikama

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#17,396,702
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Hybrid Imaging
#38
of 80 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,704
of 175,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Hybrid Imaging
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them