Title |
On simplicity and emergence
|
---|---|
Published in |
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.3758/s13423-016-1157-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrew Perfors |
Abstract |
Mark Johnson's paper centres around a provocative and sensible point: the simplicity of a change in evolutionary terms does not necessarily map straightforwardly onto the simplicity of that change within aformal system. This commentary discusses these implications in more depth, making the point that it isimportant to consider the level at which an operation occurs in order to correctly evaluate how complex it is. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 29% |
Researcher | 3 | 21% |
Professor | 2 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 14% |
Linguistics | 2 | 14% |
Psychology | 2 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 14% |
Philosophy | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,718,021
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#269
of 1,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,205
of 426,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.