| Title |
Diversification rates in Ctenodactylidae (Rodentia, Mammalia) from Mongolia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12549-016-0265-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adriana Oliver, Oscar Sanisidro, Bayarmaa Baatarjav, Ichinnorov Niiden, Gudrun Daxner-Höck |
| Abstract |
Gundis, or comb rats, are rodents of the family Ctenodactylidae. Extant gundis are restricted to Africa and represent a vestige of the diversity that the ctenodactylids attained at both palaeoecological and palaeobiogeographical levels. Here, we present an updated review of the Ctenodactylidae from the Valley of Lakes, Mongolia, based on the study of large collections now available. We have recognised 13 valid species of ctenodactylids grouped into five genera: Karakoromys, Huangomys, Tataromys, Yindirtemys, and Prodistylomys. The ctenodactylids show an initial burst in diversification in the early Oligocene followed by a sequential generic extinction of Karakoromys, Huangomys, and Tataromys. A maximum richness peak at the late Oligocene was followed by a profound diversity crisis. Yindirtemys, the only surviving genus, persisted into the Miocene, joining three Prodistylomys species. These last representatives of the group disappeared coinciding with the late Xiejian faunal reorganisation (Mongolian biozone D). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 25% |
| Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2017.
All research outputs
#15,440,760
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments
#271
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,657
of 420,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.