↓ Skip to main content

Several sharp inequalities about the first Seiffert mean

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inequalities and Applications, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 175)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Several sharp inequalities about the first Seiffert mean
Published in
Journal of Inequalities and Applications, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13660-018-1763-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Boyong Long, Ling Xu, Qihan Wang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,578,315
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inequalities and Applications
#28
of 175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,173
of 339,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inequalities and Applications
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.