↓ Skip to main content

Relation between earthquake swarm activity and tides in the Noto region, Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Relation between earthquake swarm activity and tides in the Noto region, Japan
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, February 2024
DOI 10.1186/s40623-024-01985-x
Authors

Fuyuki Hirose, Koji Tamaribuchi, Akio Kobayashi, Kenji Maeda

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Researcher 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#5,312,479
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#230
of 1,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,044
of 334,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#8
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.