↓ Skip to main content

Classification of four ovine breeds of southern peninsular zone of India: Morphometric study using classical discriminant function analysis

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Classification of four ovine breeds of southern peninsular zone of India: Morphometric study using classical discriminant function analysis
Published in
SpringerPlus, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-2-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Anand Jain, Viswanath Sheshagirirao Kulkarni, Mandera Giriyappa Govindaiah, Thimmappa Aswathnarayan, Devinder Kumar Sadana

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Student > Master 3 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 50%
Environmental Science 3 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,514,847
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#499
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,989
of 284,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#22
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.