↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic factors in rectal carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, July 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Prognostic factors in rectal carcinoma
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, July 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf02554180
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Hermanek, Irene GuggenmoosHolzmann, Franz P. Gall

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Student > Postgraduate 4 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 67%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
#2,064
of 4,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,092
of 13,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them